Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Use of termitaria in surficial geochemical surveys: evidence for >125-μm size fractions as the appropriate media for gold exploration in northern Ghana

Emmanuel Arhin and Prosper M. Nude
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 10, 401-406, 10 November 2010, https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/09-004
Emmanuel Arhin
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box 24, Navrongo Campus, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Prosper M. Nude
Department of Geology, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 58, Legon, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pmnude@ug.edu.gh
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Erratum for Arhin & Nude, Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 10 (4) 401–406. - November 01, 2010

Abstract

ABSTRACT Extensive lateritization and widespread sheet wash and alluvial deposits characterize the thick regolith in the savannah regions of northern Ghana. As often is the case in these areas, the presence of these cover materials mask geochemical gold (Au) response in soils during surficial gold exploration. Anomaly detection thus becomes very difficult perhaps due to gold grain encrustation during lateritization and anomaly dilution by sheet wash deposits. Termite mound samples collected from areas of thick regolith, transported overburden and laterite cap in gold bearing areas of northern Ghana which were analyzed for gold defined anomalous zones. Gold contents were determined from size fractions consisting of −125 μm, +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm. The gold contents show relatively insignificant changes in concentration and in repeat samples in the −125 μm and +125–250 μm size fractions, but there were significant differences when sub-samples were re-analysed in the coarser samples. Gold content repeatability was relatively better in the fine size fractions (−125 μm) and decreased in the coarser size fractions. The study showed that termite mounds can be used as a geochemical sample medium to support conventional soil surveys especially in areas under thick regolith and transported cover, and the −125 μm size fraction appears the most appropriate.

KEYWORDS
  • termitaria
  • geochemical survey
  • gold exploration
  • size fractions
  • Birimian
  • northern Ghana

INTRODUCTION

Sampling of termitaria, or termite mounds, was carried out in parts of the savannah regions of northern Ghana, which is characterized by thick regolith and transported overburden (Arhin & Nude 2009). The presence of these cover materials mask geochemical gold response in soils during surficial gold (Au) exploration and thus anomaly detection becomes very difficult; perhaps due to gold grain encrustation during lateritization and anomaly dilution by sheet wash deposits (Butt 1992). Termite mounds have been used in search of economically important metals especially in regions where thick regolith materials mask bedrock mineralization (D'Orey 1975; Gleeson & Poulin 1989; Kebede 2004; Petts et al. 2009). According to these authors, mineralization overlying bedrock is carried along by termites and mixed with fine regolith materials used in building the termite mound. For this reason, during regional geochemical surveys in gold exploration in areas masked by thick regolith and transported cover, termite mounds have been used as a sampling medium to support conventional soil surveys.

Over time, the termitaria may collapse and subsequently become eroded, transported and redeposited in low-lying areas. Although these materials may be residual or transported in character (Butt & Zeegers 1992), mineralization expressed by sampling termite mounds represents site-specific or in-situ anomalies (D'Orey 1975; Kebede 2004), as the materials sampled are usually from the subsurface and generally unaffected by surficial processes. Studies by Gleeson & Poulin (1989), Kebede (2004) and many more confirm the direct relationship between the concentration of metals in termite mounds and their contents in subsurface horizons of the regolith. Sampling termite mounds is based on the assumption that the mound building activity results in an upward transfer of clay, silt, sand and fine metal grain particles to the surface, a process opposite to leaching, which often results in significant mobilization and dispersion of trace elements (Roquin et al. 1991; Chatupa & Direng 2000).

In the savannah regions of northern Ghana, termitaria occur as preserved or eroded relict mounds of various sizes and structures ubiquitously in the gently undulating terrain. We have determined the Au contents from size fractions consisting of −125 μm, +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm in termite mound samples collected in Au-bearing areas in the Wa east region, northern Ghana, where the sample medium has been used to support conventional soil surveys (Affam & Arhin 2004).

GEOLOGICAL SETTING, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND REGOLITH

Geology

The study area is within the Birimian gold-bearing belts of northern Ghana (Kesse 1985); the regional geological setting is shown in Figure 1. The Birimian terrain in Ghana comprises narrow sedimentary basins and linear volcanic belts intruded by several generations of granitoid batholiths. The regional geology has been described by several authors including Leube et al. (1990) and Hirdes et al. (1992). The rocks of the sedimentary basins include thick isoclinally folded and steeply dipping alternating phyllites, slates, sheared conglomerates, graywackes and argillaceous rocks with some tuffaceous schists and lava. The metavolcanic rocks are mainly metabasalts, metaandesites and pyroclastic rocks. The package is interbedded by a coarse clastic sedimentary sequence belonging to the Tarkwaian Group.

Fig. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1

Regional geological map of northern Ghana showing the distribution of the lighological units. Insert shows the study area.

In Ghana the granitoid rocks that intrude the Birimian have been classified into two broad categories. These are a hornblende-rich variety that is associated with the volcanic rocks and known as the ‘Dixcove or belt’ type, and a mica-rich variety that is associated with the metasedimentary rocks and referred to as ‘Cape Coast or basin type’ granitoids (Leube et al. 1990; Taylor et al. 1992; Hirdes et al. 1992). Pink microcline-hornblende granitoids with biotite subgroup known as the ‘Bongo granites’ are exposed close to Bolgatanga area in Upper East region (Leube et al. 1990). The general foliation in the Birimian rocks trends N–NNE to S–SSW. Sheared and brecciated quartz veins are extensive in the Birimian; these features together with the extensive faults control the gold mineralization (Dzigbodi-Adjimah 1993).

Physiography

The physiographical setting of the study area generally is a gently undulating landform relict with elevations from 100–250 m above mean sea level (Meyertons 1976). The area is characterized by alluvial plains, colluvial plains, flood plains, and pediments, erosional plains, rolling hills, escarpments, isolated hills and ridges. The high relief landforms occur at the north-eastern and central parts of area, which are underlain by granitic batholiths. Areas underlain by metasedimentary units are generally associated with pediments, colluvial plains, and erosional plains. Preserved and eroded relict termite mounds, consisting of cathedral and mushroom types (Roquin et al. 1991; Petts et al. 2009), and of various structures and colourations are common over the generally flat and undulating terrain. The cathedral type mounds dominate: they have broad bases with multiple sides, and range from 2.5 m to c. 5 m in height, and relatively resistant to erosion. The mushroom types are easily susceptible to collapse. They are relatively short (up to 1.5 m in height), with slender trunks and broad tops that give it an ‘umbrella’ shape.

Regolith

The regolith profile of the study area has been described by Arhin & Nude (2009) as deep, with extensive ferruginous duricrust, that has been truncated in places. The lateritic profiles generally have a surface veneer of pisoliths, whereas sheet-wash deposits cover low lying areas. The upland areas are generally marked by talus that decreases in clast size down-slope and the sheet wash areas are characterised by thin layers of colluvium, which are interspersed with alluvial plain sediments.

The spatial distributions of the regolith materials consist of residual regolith, typically preserved at ridge tops and on pediments, and proximal transported materials at the base of ridges and at moderately elevated settings (Arhin & Nude 2009). Regolith materials are preserved in the landscape as colluvium soils and scree/talus, whereas duricrust generally occurs on topographic highs and is preserved with an equigranular groundmass. In addition, transported laterites are widespread in the area and occur in the low lying areas and sometimes near streams. Areas overlain by ferruginous saprolite are typically indurated by hardpan that is encrusted with calcium carbonate and iron oxides.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

Termitaria sampling

Composite samples were collected from the termitaria following their natural distribution over an area of 10 km2 with a regular density of 100 m × 50 m that corresponds to the soil sampling grid used in a previous geochemical survey during gold exploration in the area. The density of sampling was approximately six termite mounds over 1 km2. Representative samples from the termite mounds were chipped from around the circumference of the mound at the base and 0.5-m intervals upwards to the apex of the termitaria to make up 4–6 kg samples. The quantity of chipped samples collected was controlled by the size and height of the termitaria. For example, a termitarium which is 1.5 m high was sampled at four sections: at the base and at every 0.5 m. Composite samples were also collected from areas with termite mound clusters. The samples largely consist of detrital quartz, feldspars, fine pisolithic materials and clay mineral particles with negligible compositional differences from the fine to the coarser samples. To ensure that there is Au mineralization in the subsurface, the samples were collected from mounds in Au-bearing areas that are in close proximity to known illicit mining areas. In this regard mounds that were suspected to be affected by nearby mining activities, or eroded and redeposited, were discarded in this study.

Analytical methods

The samples collected were dried in the sun for about eight hours, after which they were disaggregated and sieved to remove very coarse materials, granules and organic materials. The samples were then separated into size fractions of −125 μm, +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm of c. 1 kg each. Each size fraction was analysed by conventional fire assay-atomic absorption spectrometry (FA-AAS) (Delaney & Fletcher 1999) at a commercial laboratory at Tarkwa, Ghana, operated by SGS Mineral Services. FA-AAS is generally accepted as dependable analytical method for Au (Juvonen & Kontas 1999). The method was also chosen for comparison purposes based on previous work carried out in northern Ghana by gold exploration companies (Griffis et al. 2002).

The analytical procedure has been described by Nude & Arhin (2009). It consists of two consecutive metallurgical separations: lead fire assay followed by determination of Au by AAS. Each size sample was pulverized to 90% passing 75 μm and a 50-g charge was dissolved in a molten flux and fused in a graphite furnace at 1100° C. The Pb button was removed by cupellation at 950° C. The resultant Au prill was digested with aqua regia mixture and the solution was analysed using a Varian 55B atomic absorption spectrometer with an air-acetylene burner, to yield a detection limit of 5 ppb. Gold standards were prepared from 1000-ppm stock solution in a 10% HCl matrix. Replicate analyses of standards and field-split duplicates were used to estimate analytical precision and relative errors according to the quality control procedures of SGS Mineral Service Laboratories.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Distribution of gold contents in the different size fractions

The Au contents (ppb) in the various size fractions of the termite mounds are presented in Table 1. Gold contents in −125-μm sizes were compared with those of the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm size fractions. The data indicate that the four size fractions appear to contain relatively significant Au concentrations defining the same anomalous zones (Fig. 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Gold values in ppb from FA-AAS analyses of the different size fractions from the termite mounds

Fig. 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2

Comparison of gold (Au) contents in the −125 μm size fractions with Au contents in the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm size fractions.

The −125 μm and +125–250 μm size samples have similar Au geochemical patterns to the plots of the original data but with higher absolute Au contents in the smaller size (−125 μm) fraction (Fig. 3). Replicate analyses show insignificant variation in the −125 μm size samples but relatively pronounced variations were shown in the replicate analyses of the +125–250 μm size fraction. For example, in the −125 μm size fractions from termite mound number 31, the original concentration of Au of 464 ppb returned 451 ppb when the sample was re-analysed. However, the Au content in the +125–250 μm size fraction from the same termite mound which was originally 178 ppb returned only 50 ppb when the samples were re-analysed. Again, in termite mound number 40, the Au content in the −125 μm size fractions was 310 ppb in the original sample with 300 ppb in the repeat analysis; however, the +125–250 μm size fraction showed 290 ppb in the original analysis but only 59 ppb in the repeat analysis. In both cases, the repeat analyses of the −125 μm size fractions were still significant whereas the +125–250 μm size fraction decreased considerably. Hence, based on enhanced Au content and repeatability (Table 1), the −125 μm size fraction appears to be more dependable for Au than the +125–250 μm size fraction.

Fig. 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3

Comparison of gold (Au) contents in the −125 μm size fractions with Au contents in the +125–250 μm size fractions.

Similarly, in Figures 4 and 5, Au contents in the −125 μm size fraction are relatively more enhanced than in the +250–500 μm and the +500 μm size fractions, although they show similar patterns. However, the latter two size fractions have relatively poor precision (Table 1).

Fig. 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4

Comparison of gold (Au) contents in the −125 μm size fractions with Au contents in the +125–500 μm size fractions.

Fig. 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5

Comparison of gold (Au) contents in the −125 μm size fractions with Au contents in the +500 μm size fractions.

Importantly, the repeatability in analysis for Au is more variable with the coarser size fractions. Chatupa & Direng (2000) attribute the enhanced Au contents in the fine fractions in the sandveld regolith, Botswana, to the greater surface area to volume ratio of the particles. It is also possible that the poor reproducibility of analysis in the coarser size fractions shown in this study could be due to detrital Au grains or nugget effects. The implication is that using coarser size fractions as sample media could be problematic, as false anomalies could erroneously be interpreted as residual.

From this study, it is evident that there is gold mobilization through the thick regolith and transported cover as a result of the termite mound building process. The results suggest that termite mound surveys can be used as a supplemental exploration tool to conventional soil surveys, especially in areas of extensive cover, and more appropriately when the finer −125 μm size fractions is used.

Quantitative analysis

The Au results were also subjected to a statistical t-test in order to compare the mean Au values of the different size fractions. The −125 μm size fraction was used as the standard measure and the Au content in that size fraction was compared with the mean values of the other size fractions at a confidence level of 95%. A comparative test was conducted with the Null Hypothesis set assuming no significant difference in means with any of the other three size fractions, namely, +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm size fractions. Other alternative hypotheses were also set and tested to aid in identifying the most appropriate sample size fraction of the termitaria for gold exploration.

In the alternative hypotheses; the mean of Au contents in the −125 μm size fraction was considered to be less than the means of Au in the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm fractions. In addition, it assumed that the mean of Au in the −125 μm size fraction is not equal to the means of Au in the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm size fractions. Nonetheless, the last alternative hypothesis testing assumed the mean of Au in the −125 μm fraction to be greater than the means of Au in the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm fractions.

For the first t-test between the mean Au content in the −125 μm and +125–250 μm size fractions, the p-value was 0.021 against a 0.05 level of significance, which implies that the test was significant. This results in the rejection of the Null Hypothesis in favour of the alternative which implies that the mean Au content in the −125 μm fraction is greater than that of the +125–250 μm size fraction. The second t-test between the mean Au content in the −125 μm and +250–500 μm fractions resulted in p-value of 0.0006 against a 0.05 level of significance which shows that the test was significant. Again the Null Hypothesis was rejected in favour of the alternative, implying that the mean Au content in the −125 μm size fraction is greater than the mean Au in the +250–500 μm size fraction. The last t-test between the mean Au content in the −125 μm and +500 μm size fractions resulted in a p-value of 0.0297 against a 0.05 level of significance, which indicates that the test was significant. This hypothesis testing also favours the alternative testing but rejects the Null Hypothesis that the mean in the −125 μm size fraction is greater than the mean for Au in the +500 μm fraction.

The statistical analyses suggest that the mean Au content in the −125 μm size fraction is greater than that in any of the other three size fractions. This again shows that whereas termitaria sampling can be used to support soils during surficial geochemical surveys for gold exploration in northern Ghana, the fine size fractions are the most appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional methods for gold exporation in regional soil surveys in northern Ghana have often resulted in erratic gold results (Griffis et al. 2002), probably due to the thick regolith, including transported overburden and laterite caps that mask subsurface mineralization. This study confirms the remobilization of gold during the construction of termitaria. A termite mound survey can therefore be useful as a supplementary tool to conventional soil surveys especially in areas with extensive cover. The materials, irrespective of the size fractions, have consistent gold contents. This strongly suggests that the relative enhanced gold values in the fine fractions are a result of dispersion during the building of the termite mounds rather than compositional differences in the termitaria. As termites can burrow to depths of the water table (D'Orey 1975), samples from termite mounds are residual and therefore more likely to be representative of bedrock and subsurface mineralization. For this reason, gold contents from the termitaria can often be more dependable than the surficial soils.

The results from this study show that the +125–250 μm, +250–500 μm and +500 μm size fractions lack sample repeatability during re-analyses for gold. However, the −125 μm size fraction has better precision for gold. Therefore, based on enhanced gold content and repeatability, the −125 μm size fraction is considered to be the most appropriate and practical size fraction for supporting soil surveys in gold target delineation during ‘greenfields’ exploration in areas of cover.

Acknowledgments

The research collaboration reported here was generously supported by Ghana Government research grants. We sincerely appreciate reviews by Steven Hill and Anna Petts, and the helpful comments by the journal editor, which led to improvements of the manuscript.

  • © 2010 AAG/Geological Society of London

References

  1. ↵
    1. Affam M.,
    2. Arhin E.
    2004. Termite Mound – a supplementary geochemical gold sampling medium in complex regolith terrains. Ghana Mining Journal, 8, 1–7.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Arhin E.,
    2. Nude P.M.
    2009. Significance of regolith mapping and its implication for gold exploration in northern Ghana: a case study at Tinga and Kunche. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 9, 63–69; doi:10.1144/1467-7873/08-189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Butt C.R.M.
    1992. Physical weathering and dispersion. In: Butt C.R.M., Zeegers H. (eds) Regolith exploration geochemistry in tropical and subtropical terrains (Handbook of exploration geochemistry, volume 4). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 97–118.
  4. ↵
    1. Butt C.R.M.,
    2. Zeegers H.
    1992. Regolith exploration in tropical terrains. In: Butt C.R.M., Zeegers H. (eds) Regolith exploration geochemistry in tropical and subtropical terrains (Handbook of exploration geochemistry, volume 4). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 3–24.
  5. ↵
    1. Chatupa J.C.,
    2. Direng B.B.
    2000. Distribution of trace and major elements in the −180 +75 μm and −75 μm fractions of the sandveld regolith in northwest Ngamiland, Botswana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 30 3, 515–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Delaney T.A.,
    2. Fletcher W.K.
    1999. Efficiency of cyanidation in gold exploration using soils. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 66, 229–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. D'Orey F.L.C.
    1975. Contribution of termite mounds to locating hidden copper deposits. Transactions of the Institute of Mineral and Metallurgy, 84, 150–156.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Dzigbodi-Adjimah K.
    1993. Geology and geochemical patterns of the Birimian gold deposits, Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 47, 305–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Gleeson C.F.,
    2. Poulin R.
    1989. Gold exploration in Niger using soil and Termitaria. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 31, 253–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Griffis J.,
    2. Barning K.,
    3. Agezo F.L.,
    4. Akosa F.
    2002. Gold Deposits of Ghana. Mineral Commission, Accra, Ghana.
  11. ↵
    1. Hirdes W.,
    2. Davis D.W.,
    3. Eisenlohr B.N.
    1992. Reassessment of Proterozoic granitoids ages in Ghana on the basis of U/Pb zircon and monazite dating. Precambrian Research, 56, 89–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Juvonen R.,
    2. Kontas E.
    1999. Comparison of three analytical methods in the determination of gold in six Finnish gold ore, including a study on sample preparation and sampling. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 65, 219–229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Kebede F.
    2004. Use of termite mounds in geochemical exploration in North Ethiopia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 40, 101–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Kesse G.O.
    1985. The mineral and rock resources of Ghana. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
  15. ↵
    1. Leube A.,
    2. Hirdes W.,
    3. Mauer R.,
    4. Kesse G.O.
    1990. The early Proterozoic Birimian Super group of Ghana and some aspects of its associated gold mineralisation. Precambrian Research, 46, 139–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Meyertons E.T.
    1976. Ghana study NRG/247. A metallogenic map of northwestern Ghana. Minerals Department, ESSO Eastern Inc., Canada.
  17. ↵
    1. Nude P.M.,
    2. Arhin E.
    2009. Overbank sediments as appropriate geochemical sample media in reconnaissance regional stream sediment surveys in the savannah regions of northern Ghana. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 103, 50–56; doi:10.1016/j.explo.2009.06.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Petts A.E.,
    2. Hill S.M.,
    3. Worrall L.
    2009. Termite species variations and their importance for termitaria biogeochemistry: towards a robust media approach for mineral exploration. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 9, 257–266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Roquin C.,
    2. Freyssinet P.H.,
    3. Novikoff A.,
    4. Tardy Y.
    1991. Geochemistry of termitaria and soils covering ferricrete: Application to gold exploration in Western Africa. European Network on Tropical Laterite and Global Environment, Eurolat '91, Supergene Ore Deposits and Mineral Formation, 5th International Meeting, 133–137.
  20. ↵
    1. Taylor P.N.,
    2. Moorbath S.,
    3. Leube A.,
    4. Hirdes W.
    1992. Early Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Birimian of Ghana: constraints from geochronology and isotope geology. Precambrian Research, 56, 77–111.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis: 10 (4)
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
Volume 10, Issue 4
November 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Use of termitaria in surficial geochemical surveys: evidence for >125-μm size fractions as the appropriate media for gold exploration in northern Ghana

Emmanuel Arhin and Prosper M. Nude
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 10, 401-406, 10 November 2010, https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/09-004
Emmanuel Arhin
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box 24, Navrongo Campus, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prosper M. Nude
Department of Geology, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 58, Legon, Ghana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pmnude@ug.edu.gh

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Use of termitaria in surficial geochemical surveys: evidence for >125-μm size fractions as the appropriate media for gold exploration in northern Ghana

Emmanuel Arhin and Prosper M. Nude
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 10, 401-406, 10 November 2010, https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/09-004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of termitaria in surficial geochemical surveys: evidence for >125-μm size fractions as the appropriate media for gold exploration in northern Ghana
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • GEOLOGICAL SETTING, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND REGOLITH
    • Physiography
    • SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Determining the magnitude of true analytical error in geochemical analysis
  • Catchment basin modelling of stream sediment anomalies revisited: incorporation of EDA and fractal analysis
  • The characteristics of rare earth elements in bulk precipitation, throughfall, foliage and lichens in the Lesní potok catchment and its vicinity, Czech Republic
Show more: Article
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Catchment-based gold prospectivity analysis combining geochemical, geophysical and geological data across northern Australia
  • A continental-scale geochemical atlas for resource exploration and environmental management: the National Geochemical Survey of Australia
  • Geochemical and mineralogical controls on metal(loid) dispersion in streams and stream sediments in the Prairie Creek district, NWT
  • Introduction to the thematic issue: analysis of exploration geochemical data for mapping of anomalies
  • Evaluation of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) in exploration and mining: Phase 1, control reference materials
More...

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

 

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1467-7873
Online ISSN 
2041-4943

Copyright © 2019 AAG/Geological Society of London