Lyell Collection
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lima, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cicchella, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2008; v. 8; issue.1; p. 41-48;
DOI: 10.1144/1467-7873/07-146
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Interpolation methods for geochemical maps: a comparative study using arsenic data from European stream waters

A. Lima1, J.A. Plant2, B. De Vivo1, T. Tarvainen3, S. Albanese1 & D. Cicchella4

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Napoli, Italy *(anlima{at}unina.it)
2 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
3 Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland
4 Dipartimento di Studi Geologici ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi del Sannio, Benevento, Italy

A geochemical map of As in water from the FOREGS Geochemical Atlas of Europe, performed using the Alkemia interpolation method based on moving weighted median (MWM), and a comparable map prepared by kriging are compared with an As map prepared with a new multifractal inverse distance weighted (MIDW) interpolation method using GeoDasTM software. The colour scale classification of the MIDW interpolated map of As is based on the concentration–area (C-A) fractal method which allows images to be subdivided into components representing specific features on the ground related, for example, to geology.

Conventional techniques, such as MWM and kriging, are shown to smooth out the local variability of the geochemical data. The problem is most serious in maps prepared by kriging which erroneously show large areas of Europe to have high levels of As in water. On the other hand, MIDW creates a geochemical map in which information about the local data structure is retained. This is essential in distinguishing anomalies from background values. The information provided by background and anomaly maps, using the MIDW and fractal filtering methods, are shown to give more reliable upper limits of background values.

Key Words: geochemical map • multifractal interpolation • fractal filtering • kriging