Lyell Collection
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polito, P.
Right arrow Articles by Oates, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2007; v. 7; issue.2; p. 129-138;
DOI: 10.1144/1467-7873/07-125
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Application of sulphur isotopes to discriminate Cu–Zn VHMS mineralization from barren Fe sulphide mineralization in the greenschist to granulite facies Flin Flon–Snow Lake–Hargrave River region, Manitoba, Canada

Paul Polito1,2, Kurt Kyser1, David Lawie3, Steven Cook4 & Chris Oates5

1 Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada (e-mail PaulPolito@angloamerican.com.au)
2 Current address: Anglo American Exploration (Australia), PO Box 1067, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia
3 ioGlobal, PO Box 1425, West Perth, WA 6872, Australia
4 Cook Geochemical Consulting, 5-3341 Mary Anne Crescent, Victoria, BC, V9C 3S7, Canada
5 Anglo American plc, 20 Carlton House Terrace, London, SW1Y 5AN, UK

The Flin Flon Belt in northern Canada is one of the largest Palaeoproterozoic volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) districts in the world, but up to 20 000 km2 of prospective Palaeoproterozoic basement south of this belt is buried beneath 10 to 100 m of Phanerozoic calcareous cover. The recent acquisition of airborne SPECTREM geophysics data south of the Flin Flon Belt has resulted in the discovery of Cu-Zn sulphide prospects comprising pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena, but numerous barren Fe sulphide occurrences comprising only pyrite and pyrrhotite have also been intersected. The problem for explorers is trying to determine whether a barren Fe sulphide intersection that has just been cored is part of a larger Cu-Zn mineralized system, or nothing more than a pyrite–pyrrhotite occurrence.

A sulphur isotope study of sulphides from the Flin Flon–Snow Lake–Hargrave River–Talbot area shows that sulphides from the Cu-Zn VHMS deposits have {delta}34S values that range between –1.4 and 6.4{per thousand}, with a mean {delta}34S value of 1.6 ± 1.7{per thousand} (2{sigma} error). More than 95% of these samples have {delta}34S values of <3.3{per thousand}. In contrast, pyrite and pyrrhotite separates from barren Fe sulphide deposits have {delta}34S values between 1.8 and 10.0{per thousand}, with a mean {delta}34S value of 4.3 ± 1.8{per thousand} (2{sigma} error). In this case, >84% of these samples have {delta}34S values of >3.3{per thousand}. The results imply that the barren Fe sulphide deposits can be statistically distinguished from Cu-Zn VHMS mineralization based on S isotopic composition, which should make future exploration drilling decisions easier.

Key Words: {delta}34S-isotopes • copper • zinc • Flin Flon • Snow Lake • Harmin • Talbot • Osborne • exploration