Lyell Collection

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirlo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Giblin, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2004; v. 4; issue.2; p. 113-127;
DOI: 10.1144/1467-7873/03-027
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Application of groundwater–mineral equilibrium calculationsto geochemical exploration for sediment-hosted uranium:observations from the Frome Embayment,South Australia

Mark C. Pirlo1,2 & Angela M. Giblin3

1 ARC GEMOC National Key Centre, Dept. Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia (e-mail: Mark.Pirlo@csiro.au)
2 Present address: CSIRO Exploration and Mining, PO Box 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
3 CSIRO Exploration and Mining, PO Box 136, North Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia

This paper considers the interpretation of uranium (U) ore–mineral equilibrium calculations in groundwater to help understand ore genesis and assist exploration. Groundwater samples collected on two recent field sampling trips in the Frome Embayment region of South Australia have been analysed for major and selected trace elements. These data together with previous published data have been used to construct geochemical models of the equilibrium state of the groundwaters. Species’ activities and mineral saturation states have been estimated. Calculated species’ activities are generally in the range reported in the previous modelling by Giblin involving groundwaters from similar local sources. Our models indicate that amorphous UO2, rather than the ore minerals coffinite and uraninite, is the solidU mineral phase that is the likely control on groundwater U concentration. The UO2(am) saturation index did not show a systematic variation with ore grade or proximity to mineralization. Its use for exploration at smaller scales, where the groundwater composition is similar between sample sites and U minerals are present at various concentrations, is doubtful. Inherent limitations on the information provided by mineral saturation indices restrict their exploration application,particularly in high salinity palaeochannel groundwater environments, such as those common in Australia.

Key Words: uranium exploration • Frome Embayment • groundwater • saturation indices




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, AnalysisHome page
P. de Caritat, D.C. McPhail, K. Kyser, and C. J. Oates
Using groundwater chemical and isotopic composition in the search for base metal deposits: hydrogeochemical investigations in the Hinta and Kayar Pb-Zn districts, India
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 2009; 9: 215 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]