Lyell Collection
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carey, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2003; v. 3; issue.3; p. 239-244;
DOI: 10.1144/1467-7873/03-005
© 2003 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Nitrogen budget of the Mobile–Alabama River System watershed

Anne E. Carey1, Carmen A. Nezat2, Jonathan R. Pennock3, Tracy Jones4 & W. Berry Lyons5

1 Environmental Institute and Center for Freshwater Studies, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa AL 35487 Present address Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210–1398, USA(e-mail carey@geology.ohio-state.edu)
2 Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa AL 35487 Present address Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48104–1063, USA(e-mail cnezat@umich.edu)
3 Dauphin Island Sea Lab, The University of Alabama, Dauphin Island AL 36528 Present address Marine Studies Program, University of New Hampshire, Durham NH 03824–3505, USA(e-mail jonathan.pennock@unh.edu)
4 Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of North Alabama, Florence AL 35632, USA(e-mail tjones2@unanov.una.edu)
5 Department of Geological Sciences and Center for Freshwater Studies, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 Present address Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210–1002, USA(e-mail lyons.142@osu.edu)

We have determined the nitrogen mass balance for the Mobile–Alabama River System (MARS) for two years of different hydrologic regimes (i.e. low flow vs. high flow). The maximum riverine export of N from the watershed is only 7%, suggesting relatively high retention and/or losses of N by denitrification within the watershed. Previous investigations of other watersheds within the USA demonstrate export percentages of c. 20–25%. Our calculations indicate that during a high flow year such as 1990, c. 13% of the new N introduced to the watershed annually is lost within the riverine system either through diatom uptake or denitrification. Another 4% is lost to the groundwater while 25–38% is sequestered by the terrestrial biomass (i.e. crop production and forest growth). Thus, as much as 51% of the N input to the landscape in the MARS is unaccounted for. We believe the location of this ‘missing’ N is probably within the soil, or the N has been lost through denitrification within the terrestrial ecosystem. The relatively low N yield from the MARS suggests that the watershed is not as saturated with respect to N as are many other U.S. drainages.

Key Words: Nitrogen • nitrate • mass balance • rivers • hydrology