Lyell Collection

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flegal, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2002; v. 2; issue.3; p. 211-217;
DOI: 10.1144/1467-787302-024
© 2002 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Mercury contamination from historic mining in water and sediment, Guadalupe River and San Francisco Bay, California

Martha A. Thomas1, Christopher H. Conaway1, Douglas J. Steding1,2, Mark Marvin-DiPasquale3, Khalil E. Abu-Saba4 & A. Russell Flegal1

1 Department of Environmental Toxicology, WIGS Laboratory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
3 United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
4 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

The New Almaden mercury mines in California (USA), which collectively represent the largest historic producers of mercury in North America, are a persistent source of mercury contamination to the San Francisco Bay estuary. An estimate based on total mercury concentration (HgTOT) and provisional stream flow data measured at a gauging station in the Guadalupe River during base flow conditions yields a base flow flux of 30 g of mercury for the month of October 2000. In contrast to this base flow estimate, one 2-day rain event in October 2000 resulted in a flux of 22 g of mercury past this site. An estimate of mercury transport from the entire Guadalupe River watershed based on a sediment transport model and our measured suspended particulate HgTOT (0.5–4 µg g–1) results in a total of 4–30 kg year–1 transported to the southern reach of the estuary. Sediments in the southern reach have lower HgTOT (most ≤0.4 µg g–1 dry wt) and monomethylmercury (MMHg, c. 1 ng g–1 dry wt) concentrations than those in the Guadalupe River (HgTOT, 0.41–33 µg g–1 dry wt; MMHg, 1–10 ng g–1 dry wt). Because the most elevated methylmercury concentrations (8–12 ng g–1 dry wt) were found in sediments deposited immediately upstream of hydraulic structures (e.g. diversion dams and weirs) within the river, it is proposed that such physical structures may represent important zones of MMHg production and fluxes to San Francisco Bay.

Key Words: mercury • methylmercury • water • sediment • Guadalupe River • San Francisco Bay • estuaries