Lyell Collection

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klassen, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; 2001; v. 1; issue.2; p. 163-173
© 2001 Geological Society of London

Regular Article

The interpretation of background variation in regional geochemical surveys – an example from Nunavut, Canada

Rodney A. Klassen

1 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada (e-mail: klassen{at}nrcan.gc.ca)

In glaciated terrains, geochemical maps portray bedrock provenance and the integrated effects of glacial processes affecting the distribution, concentration, and partitioning of minerals in sediments. In those maps, indicators of economic mineralization can be difficult to distinguish in the context of natural background, especially at low trace metal concentrations. Sample mineralogy, which can be inferred from lithophile elements, provides a key basis for interpreting sediment provenance and controls on background variation in metal concentrations. In non-carbonate terrain, the principal rock-forming minerals digested by aqua regia are Mg-bearing phyllosilicates, including trioctohedral chlorite, biotite, and phlogopite. Hence, Mg analyses directly reflect the concentrations of those minerals. In a regional geochemical survey of till in Nunavut, strong linear correlations (r>0.840, n=1842, p<0.0001) for Cu and Cr with Mg concentrations indicate Mg-bearing phyllosilicates are the principal metal hosts, and that the metals are bound in mineral lattice structures in direct proportion to Mg. Thus, metal:Mg ratios express geochemical properties of the mineral(s) hosting the metal, and are independent of mineral partitioning among size fractions that results from either glacial or postglacial processes. Ratio maps can be used to establish till provenance and infer aspects of bedrock composition not evident in single-element geochemical maps. Ratio anomalies could indicate metals derived from economic indicators such as sulphide minerals, and metal-rich particulate from anthropogenic sources.

Key Words: geochemistry • lithophile element • drift prospecting • environment • background